On December 5, the NYC city council passed the City of Yes (COY) rezoning plan, the largest zoning change in many decades. This is designed to enable more housing development, estimated at 80,000 new units over the next decade. COY changes a huge part of the code (see our overview), and parking requirements turned out to be one of the most contentious changes.
For new development, NYC often prescribes a minimal number of required parking. For example, a single-family home might require one parking spot, while a 20-unit building might require ten. There's strong agreement that these requirements increase construction costs, because they simply force developers to build parking even if it's not used.
The initial draft for COY proposed fully eliminating the requirements. which would've made this blog post much shorter. However, the final compromise only provides a partial reduction in requirements.
In this post, we give you a way of understanding the new requirements:
The changes were bigger than we thought, so let's summarize the impact:
Below, we'll give you the detail on how we come to this conclusion, but if you are looking at multi-family development, this should be good news, and even more importantly, news that's easy to understand.
With the City of Yes, the city has been divided into three zones:
Finding your new requirements goes like this:
We put the results in table form, showing you both the two zones under COY and the rules before COY passed.
Outer Transit | Beyond | Before COY | |
% of DU | 50% | 100% | 100% |
Implied parking | 1 | 2 | 2 |
Waiver | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Parking required | 1 | 2 | 2 |
In this example, the Beyond zone shows up unchanged, but the Outer Transit zone sees the requirement reduced by 50%.
Now let's look at something with more density, maybe an R5 with 5 units:
Outer Transit | Beyond | Before COY | |
% of DU | 35% | 50% | 85% |
Implied parking | 2 | 3 | 4 |
Waiver | 10 | 5 | 0 |
Parking required | 0 | 0 | 2 |
This shows that the new rules have lower parking requirements in all zones. We'll get back to this, this could make a huge difference.
It's more of a reduction than we initially believed.
The 3-zone compromise was often interpreted as follows: "Parking requirements will be largely maintained in areas outside of the above geographies." (note: not a criticism of this high-quality article).
Even in the outer zones, parking requirements are reduced. We can't yet fully gauge how much this matters in practice. For example, if the vast majority of districts in the outer zone are still at 100% requirements, then obviously nothing did change. But a cursory look at the zoning map shows a lot of R4 and R5 districts in the outer zone, and thus large reductions in requirements. We will get back to this. Our key goal, always, is to give you a full, quantitative overview of the importance of the changes.
The waivers are so large that, in practice, parking requirements don't matter anymore. Let's take an example from the outer transit zone: In an R6 district, the parking should cover 25% of units, with a waiver of 15. That means that one can build up to 60 units without any parking. And this is far beyond what's common for R6, which usually has between 5-20 units.
And even if we leave the inner transit zone, we would only need to add parking after the first 20 units. Which is, in practice not a constraint even if the building has more than 20 units, because the developer would want some level of parking in the outer neighborhoods.
With the COY changes, parking requirements have, in practice, been eliminated for multi-family development. This is good because that's likely where they had most construction impact. Under COY, there are still some zoning districts that prescribe that every unit must have parking, but that's likely a small cost, because those districts also have big lots and plenty of space to offer parking.
If you want to develop multi-family units, your process now became much easier, since you can focus on building the parking that you deem most profitable, which might often be no parking at all.
Of course, finding out the exact details can be hard, and our goal is to provide simple guidance, at the lot level. We expect that, in a few weeks, we can include the parking requirements in our zoning overview, so that you won't have to remember the complex tables below.
If you have any questions about this article, the requirements, or how Zoned Insights can help you, please contact us.
To get updates on new blog posts, please subscribe to this blog.
See page 364 of the zoning code (warning, 100MB)
See page 366 of the zoning code (warning, 100MB)
Footnotes: